Welcome to EON Photography Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
if both costed the same, canon 14mm o 16-35?; please post feedback if any as well
Topic Started: Jan 9 2009, 05:49 AM (2,954 Views)
waikru Jan 9 2009, 05:49 AM Post #1
Noobie
[ * * ]
 if both costed the same, which canon uwa lens would you buy: 14mm 2.8 o 16-35mm 2.8?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
quickrelease Jan 9 2009, 09:47 AM Post #2
Member Avatar
Certified EON Poster
[ * * * * * * * * ]
 OT: wow ang yaman ni waikru!

wala po akong alam dyan. alam ko lang mahal ung 16-35 2.8 pasensya na po :)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Bochog101 Jan 9 2009, 10:50 AM Post #3
Member Avatar
Certified EON Poster
[ * * * * * * * * ]
 im not a canon user(as of January 2009.....) but im eyeing for Canon 5D & 16-35 2.8 L II combo..for my landscape purposes. I have the same dilemma as with Nikon 14mm 2.8 and the 17-35 f2.8, the 14mm is very much cheaper and one of the widest lens available for FX sensor, though I cannot use any of my filters. almost 95% of my pictures are taken with filters. Just to answer my "needs & wants", I'll get 17-35 or if Im gonna switch soon, it will be the 16-35 f2.8 L II

OT: Ang mura ng Canon 16-35 f2.8 L II dito sa SG, compare sa Nikon 17-35 f2.8 huhuhuhuhu... tapos parehas lang ang price ng Nikon D300 sa Canon 5D MK1....waaaaahhhhhh :wala:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Amaru Jan 9 2009, 04:20 PM Post #4
Member Avatar
Certified EON Poster
[ * * * * * * * * ]
Bochog101
Jan 9 2009, 10:50 AM
im not a canon user(as of January 2009.....) but im eyeing for Canon 5D & 16-35 2.8 L II combo..for my landscape purposes. I have the same dilemma as with Nikon 14mm 2.8 and the 17-35 f2.8, the 14mm is very much cheaper and one of the widest lens available for FX sensor, though I cannot use any of my filters. almost 95% of my pictures are taken with filters. Just to answer my "needs & wants", I'll get 17-35 or if Im gonna switch soon, it will be the 16-35 f2.8 L II

OT: Ang mura ng Canon 16-35 f2.8 L II dito sa SG, compare sa Nikon 17-35 f2.8 huhuhuhuhu... tapos parehas lang ang price ng Nikon D300 sa Canon 5D MK1....waaaaahhhhhh :wala:
Canon 5D MKII 128k nakita ko sa dyaryo :D
kayang kaya mo aaron ;)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ansbert30 Jan 9 2009, 04:26 PM Post #5
Member Avatar
Certified EON Poster
[ * * * * * * * * ]
 no comment :D
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Bochog101 Jan 11 2009, 12:33 AM Post #6
Member Avatar
Certified EON Poster
[ * * * * * * * * ]
ansbert30
Jan 9 2009, 04:26 PM
no comment :D
aysus...sorry manster, di po ako mayaman tulad nyo hehehehe :hihi:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
br0th3r Jan 21 2009, 11:30 PM Post #7
Member Avatar
Certified EON Poster
[ * * * * * * * * ]
 I'd go for 16-35 2.8 L II.. or Sigma 10-20mm... hehehe... murang mura ng UWA... :2thumbsup:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Gadgets Galore · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Theme by James of the ZBTZ and themeszetaboards.com